CURRIER: Reducing the speed limit on Wellington, beneficial or not?

3 hours ago

Published Nov 23, 2024  •  Last updated 19 hours ago  •  2 minute read

The request to lower the speed limit on Wellington from 50 km to 30 is gaining strength and support, but is it necessary? Photo by Gavin Young /Postmedia

To fix a problem, you first need to clearly identify what the problem is. In the case of reducing the speed limit on Wellington Crescent, City Hall is misidentifying the issue and its solution.

Speed - Figure 1
Photo Winnipeg Sun

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Exclusive columns by Ryan Stelter, Paul Friesen, Ted Wyman, Scott Billeck, Lorrie Goldstein, Warren Kinsella and others. Plus newsletters: Gimme Stelter for your beat on the city, The Exit Row for all your Jets news and On the Rocks for curling.Unlimited online access to Winnipeg Sun and 15 news sites with one account.Winnipeg Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

Exclusive columns by Ryan Stelter, Paul Friesen, Ted Wyman, Scott Billeck, Lorrie Goldstein, Warren Kinsella and others. Plus newsletters: Gimme Stelter for your beat on the city, The Exit Row for all your Jets news and On the Rocks for curling.Unlimited online access to Winnipeg Sun and 15 news sites with one account.Winnipeg Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Speed - Figure 2
Photo Winnipeg Sun
Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account

or

Article content

The request to lower the speed limit on Wellington from 50 km per hour to 30 — from River to Academy — is gaining strength and support. It’s easy to understand why some believe this change is needed. Cyclist Rob Jenner was struck and killed on that stretch earlier this year. A life was needlessly ended, a family was devastated, and their lives will never be the same.

Our city’s cyclists deserve to be protected and should arrive at their destinations safely, as do motorists. In recent years our city has spent unprecedented amounts of money on bike paths and dedicated bike lanes. Whether those lanes are used enough to be worth the money invested, or the disruption to businesses and traffic, is open to debate.

In the case of Rob Jenner’s death, the speed limit on Wellington was not the cause of his death. It didn’t make travelling on a bicycle unsafe. The problem was that the driver who killed Mr. Jenner was travelling at 150 km per hour.

Speed - Figure 3
Photo Winnipeg Sun

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

Article content

We are impelled to buy into the fact that if the speed limit had been reduced, the driver would have respected that speed limit.

Those pushing for the reduction rightly point out the incidents of speeding along the stretch where Mr. Jenner was struck in June, but they deny that those same speeders are no more likely to observe a 30 km speed limit than the current 50 km.

If someone is prepared to drive 150 km per hour in a 50 km zone, we can’t expect that they’ll slow down to 30 if we change the sign.

One theory is that if that stretch becomes a 30 km zone, some drivers will use alternate routes. Another pleasant but naive notion since the issues isn’t volume, but the speed of the traffic.

Enforcement may be our best option to prevent more tragedies. However, even if one per cent of the population refuses to obey a law, it becomes unenforceable. There aren’t enough police officers on our streets to catch all of the people who refuse to obey current speed limits.

Article content

Our city has a habit of embracing solutions without clearly identifying the problem. The so-called calming circles installed in some neighbourhoods, for example, were put in place without any metrics proving that they were needed or that they would enhance safety. An expensive solution to a nonexistent problem.

Before City Council rushes to reduce the speed limit on Wellington Crescent, or any other road in Winnipeg, can we be provided with evidence that those changes would be beneficial?

Recommended from Editorial

CURRIER: Funding the arts in Manitoba — crucial or subjective?

CURRIER: Canada owes Sinclair to act upon the 94 recommendations

— Geoff Currier is a former Winnipeg broadcaster.

Have thoughts on what’s going on in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada or across the world? Send us a letter to the editor at [email protected].

Article content

Read more
Similar news
This week's most popular news